Monday, August 18, 2008

Mission M&M

India needs to be bold and innovative with their strategies if they are to be competitive in Srilanka. It's very clear that a 5-0 scoreline is staring us in the face. Here is my strategy note...
We need to continue playing 5 bowlers. Our best chance is to restrict the Lankan's to a reasonable score if they are setting it or less than our's if they are chasing. Everyone talks about Srilanka's strength (their bowling), but i am sure that at the back of his mind Mahela is worried about his batting. It's dependent on the big 3 and we need to get them out if we are to do well. It's a blessing that all 3 come in the top order. A good spell from Zaheer and co can break their back.
Now, to the best approach to batting. Or let's say, the best appraoch to tackle Murali and Mendis. We have two sets of batsmen- those comfortable facing M&M and those who dont have a clue. Those comfortable facing them need to face the bulk of the 20 overs they will bowl. Those not comfortable should be given the best chance of facing them- they should face them only once they have spent a good number of overs at the crease.
Sehwag (if he is fit), Gambhir and Dhoni look like the 3 most capable of facing them. They should be India's middle order. Yuvraj, Rohit and Raina should allowed to bat at the most comfortable time and should be well set before they get to face M&M. So, they need to be India's top order. Infact, batting at the top against Vaas & co must be the easiest task in Srilankan conditions. So, my batting order will be
Raina
Rohit
Yuvraj
Gambhir
Sehwag
Dhoni
Irfan should be a floater and if the openers get off to a good start, he should come up and try and score a quick 40 odd.
This might look too radical and unorthodox, but you need to be exactly that when faced with a challenge like M&M. I would infact go on to suggest that if we have wickets in hand and a guy like Sehwag to come in, a set batsman should take on Murali. he doesnt react too well when put under a hammer. Here is an interesting sub-plot- Imagine the pressure Murali will be under, if he is taken for runs while Mendis is bowling tight. Infact, I think, the advent of Mendis will harm Murali more than help him.

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Cricket Story- 2011!

The often unfair focus on batsmen is again in evidence with this new usage- Fab Four. For me, Indian cricket from 2001 has been about the " Fab Five"- Dravid- the solid one drop batsman, Saurav-the captain, Kumble- the tireless bowler, Laxman- the touch artist and Sachin. Hmmm..Sachin, the what? Before you think, this post is on Sachin baiting let me clear my stand on Sachin. Sachin, to me has changed his style of batting very courageoulsy in the last few years. It would have been easy for him to continue like the "Master Blaster". But he didnt. He curbed his stroke play for the team and in the bargain became a very laboured and often unattractive player. So, Sachin- the courageous!




For me, Indian cricket till 2001 is a story of one big FLOP. It was a story of selfish individuals, lack of ambition and above all the most over estimated sporting moment in the world -India's '83 world cup triumph. The Fab 5 changed all that. Here were 5 men who were not happy being the best in India. They wanted to be the best in the world. And they had their moments being the best. Above all, they wanted India to be the best in the world. They wanted India to start winning overseas. To me, India's string of overseas wins were bigger than WC'83. Let's give credit where it is due- the Fab 5 re-shaped the way the world looked at cricket.



They are the real cricket heroes for India but it's now time to bid farewell to them. Let's not trivialize their contributions and insult them by dropping them or forcing them out. Let's send them out with dignity and let's send them out with a plan. These are guys who always had clear plans and they would like nothing better than being phased out as part of a larger plan.



Virender Sehwag, Yuvraj Singh, MS Dhoni and Harbhajan Singh are without doubt the most talented youngsters to come out in the last 5 years. But, let's face it- Viru is walking the tight rope between " Hit" and "Miss". Yuvraj is clearly not test material, atleast till now. Dhoni is a safe keeper, a batsman who needs to work within his limitations and a captain with great potential. Harbhajan to me is a spent force. In the age of dead pitches, heavy bats and attacking batsmanship, you need tonnes of "Mystery" to succeed and the Sardar has none of it! But these 4 have a role to play. They have to be the buffers between the Fab 5 and the young turks.



Rohit Sharma, Gautam Gambhir, Ishanth Sharma, Suresh Raina and Piyush Chawla have it in them to take India to the top but they need to be phased in. So, here is the plan.



A Batsman in the Fab5 has to go out right away to accomodate a youngster. For me, the axe will have to fall on Ganguly. Kumble has to be given a specific role of keeping the run flow down in tests and has to be eased out in favor of Chawla by the end of the England series. The man who replaces Ganguly ( Rohit, as of today) has to come in at #4 and move up to #3 when the next Batsman in the Fab 5 leaves. Based on performance and form at the end of April 2009, it has to be either Dravid or Sachin. Either way, Laxman has to move into #4 and keep that role for another year. This would be the ideal time to slot in Yuvraj at # 7 (dont be surprised!!!) and bring up Dhoni to #6. This way, Yuvi has to face less of a new ball and can make tremendous impact with Dhoni and the tail. We have a +150 assured everytime we reach batsman 6,7 and down. The batting order will look like this



Sehwag


Gambhir


Rohit


Laxman


Dravid/Sachin


Dhoni


Yuvraj

Laxman and Dravid/Sachin have a very clear role to play here. They need to play with the young batsman and also help Sehwag, Gambhir, Dhoni and Yuvraj to levels that they got to, in 2003.


Now, we will get into a very critical stage. It will be time for Rahul/Sachin to leave and we need an all rounder to slot in at #7. It is hardly practical for India to have a fast bowler all rounder but in the next 2 years we need to develop a top-class spin- all rounder. We need to invest in developing Piyush Chawla or someone like him. A leggie will win us matches abroad and him at #7 will let us play 3 spinners at home. If Irfan re-discovers bowling form and can be a genuine 3rd seamer abroad, we would do even better.


The other eventuality we need to plan will have to be Sehwag's move down the order and groom a good opener. Sehwag's move down will coincide with Laxmans departure. So, for me India's test team batting order in 2011 will look like this.



Gambhir


New opener


Rohit Sharma


Sehwag


Dhoni


Yuvraj


Piyush/Irfan



For India to be the world's # 1 team by 2010, we need a world class spinner. Either, Harbhajan steps up or we get someone really special. I hope its the latter. Harbhajan and Chawla will at best be support spinners.The batting will sort itself out and we will keep getting Ishant Sharma's, but the spinner will be the key difference between us being a world beater or an also ran. Wrapping up here with a small prayer on the lips- please give us a special spinner!



Wednesday, December 26, 2007

A FEW GOOD MEN WHO FINISHED LAST

I successfully resisted the temptation of making cricket, the topic of my first post on the blog. Well, can’t resist it anymore! At the outset, let me distance myself from the typical Indian cricket fan. I like to think of myself as a serious cricket watcher (my wife knows what that means) who loves test cricket more than the instant varieties and who is not a fair weather Indian cricket fan. I should add here that in the interest of a better family life, I am trying these days to be a smart cricket watcher. One of my later posts will be on techniques that can be used to be a “Smart Cricket Watcher”.


I always prided myself on recognizing a cricket star when I saw one. But stars are created in an instant. This is the story of those men who never had that one match in the spotlight that would have made them stars. We don’t realize how that one day separates today’s stars from those who could have been. Yuvraj Singh’s Natwest trophy innings, Harbhajan’s Calcutta afternoon against the Aussies, Laxman’s innings in the same test and the unforgettable assault of Abdul Qadir by Tendulkar in Pakistan are instances of one day propelling someone into stardom. I am not saying that these stars never had it in them to be what they are today. But, there were others who never got that one performance in. This is not about men, who didn’t make it because they never had it in them or never worked hard enough. To differentiate my few good men from those, here are the one’s who didn’t deserve to make it- Madan Lal, Chetan Sharma, Arun Lal, Kirti Azad, Sunil Joshi, Sujith Somasundar, Vikram Rathour, Paras Mhambrey, Doda Ganesh, Devang Gandhi, Vijay Bharadwaj etc. This is about men, who I thought, had it in them to be stars but never made it big. I might not do too well, in putting up a case for these players but I am sure I would at least remind readers who have followed Indian cricket in the last 15-20 years of some names we missed out seeing more of.


At the risk of sounding like Englishmen who see Ian Botham in every guy who could bat, bowl ,smoke grass , drink and make a fool out of himself, let me introduce Subroto Banerjee, who to me was India’s best all-round prospect after Kapil Dev and before Irfan Pathan. He would never have been India’s bowling spearhead but an ideal first change pacer, bowling his outswingers at 130 KMPH. Imagine an Indian attack in England with Srinath, Prasad and Banerji in the mid-90’s. Again, he would never have been the test # 6 like Pathan can be (and will be) or Kapil was, but would surely have batted higher than some of the wicket keepers we had during his time. Just to put his career in perspective, he played in one test against Australia in Sydney, bowled only in the first innings and had figures of 18-4-47-3. His victims were 3 of the top four Aussie batsmen- Taylor, Marsh and Mark Waugh. His “opportunities” came in the ODI’s- 6 in 1 year and 13 days, where he was not an unqualified success with the ball, but averaged 24 with the bat with a strike rate of 116. He played a memorable innings in a loosing cause against England in the 92 World cup. There was another interesting “Fast Bowler” who played in Banerjee’s last ODI- Chetan Sharma whose international career was spread over 10 years. We all know what Mr. Sharma’s claim to fame is. The other “all rounder” who comes to mind is the epitome of Indian optimism- Ajith Agarkar!


Sadagopan Ramesh’s two last test innings were 55 and 46 against Srilanka in Colombo in 2001. At the end of his career as an India opener, his average was 37.97. Only Sehwag has a better average than him in the recent past and we all know where Sehwag is today. Ramesh showed tremendous temperament against pace and spin. He was acknowledged as one of the few guys who could read Saqlains doosra at his peak. To me, he should have been India’s regular opener even today. The cynics pointed to his faulty footwork and technique but Ramesh would have made runs anywhere in the world if only he was backed a little more, like Sehwag is, today.


Abey Kuruvilla, was acknowledged as one of India’s best medium pace prospects ever, who played test cricket at least 5 years later than he should have. He made his first class debut in 1990-91 and claimed 35 wickets in his first season. The tragedy of his story would be highlighted if I list out some of the names of fast bowlers, who played for India when Abey was at his peak for Mumbai- Dodda Ganesh, David Johnson, Prasanth Vaidya, Robin Singh Junior, Paras Mhambrey and Harvinder Singh. If Abey had played in the South African tour of 1991-92, India would have had 4 top notch medium fast bowlers between 1991 and 1997- Javagal Srinath, Venkatesh Prasad, Subroto Banerjee and Abey Kuruvilla.


Vijay Yadav, a typical Indian wicket keepers story. Yadav was very safe behind the stumps, was known to be a man capable of the big hits down the order and possessed excellent temperament as seen in his innings of 34 against South Africa, which almost was the day, he became a star. He could have been India’s Moin Khan, a man I greatly admire for his ability to quickly turn a match around and those sweeps for sixes of medium pacers. Yadav played 19 ODI’s over 2 years(talk about a fair run!), batted 12 times only, was not out on 2 occasions and scored at a career strike rate of 101. He was out for a zero in his last ODI, didn’t get to bat in the previous one and was not in the XI for the previous two. I didn’t bother checking back further. If Yadav was successful, the man he would have kept out of the ODI team would have been Nayan Mongia. Would the match fixing saga have been different then? I cannot conclude this piece on Yadav without mentioning another wicket keeper and namesake Vijay Dahiya, who was one of 5 wicketkeepers tried by India in a 16 month period in 2000-2001. His last ODI innings was a not out 15 in 15 balls against an Aussie attack lead by McGrath and Warne. He did not bat in the next 3 before he was dropped. How do you drop a guy like that?


There are other names that come to mind- Amay Khurasia, Saba Karim and Ashish Nehra . I have heard that Sandeep Patil was someone who could have been a super star and I have to add the name of Ravi Shastri who would have been India’s best captain ever. It would be a grave injustice if I don’t mention the name of Robin Singh. But injustice is something that Robin is very used to. Like Abey, if he was in the team at his peak, he would have been what Andrew Symonds is to Australia today- # 5 batsman, best fielder on the park and safe to bowl his full quota of medium pace.


Among the current crop, I will hazard a prediction of people who could feature in such a list in the future- Munaf Patel, Dinesh Karthik, Mohamad Kaif, Gautham Gambhir and last but the biggest name of all- Virender Sehwag. But fortunately, they will not be in a list of people who didnt make it because of lack of opportunity.